More pre-election lies were told by David Cameron, who famously stated "no more top-down reorganisations of the NHS" and "we'll cut the budget, not the NHS" as part of the Tory election campaign. Just a few months after joining the coalition government, Clegg and his Lib-Dem party voted through proposals to triple tuition fees for English (but not Scottish or Welsh) students, making future students pay the highest fees in the entire world for education at public university. Nick Clegg is a strong contender for his very public betrayal of the millions of students, former students and academics that voted for him after he held a signed pledge that the Lib-Dems would block any increases in tuition fees. There are several candidates for "Chief Liar" of the coalition government.
VOID BASTARDS ACHIEVEMENTS NOT WORKING CODE
Referring to disabled people by an offensive code marks their employees out as callous Bastards and the denials look like the usual pack of Lies that get churned out every time a corporation gets caught out like this.Īnother, much stronger candidate to wear the tag of " Lying Thieving Bastards" is the coalition government that put the whole sorry shambles that is the Work Programme into place. The initial temptation is to turn the table on this parasitic outsourcing company to say they are clearly the " Lying Thieving Bastards": Taking taxpayers' cash in order to help people find work, but then immediately abandoning clients that are too old, under-skilled or disabled as soon as the attachment fee has been paid is a pretty clear cut case of Thieving. The company obviously issued the utterly predictable denials that they engage in "parking" and described the use of the LTB code as "isolated incidents". The offensive code the Triage staff have been using is LTB, " Lying Thieving Bastards". Not only have this company been using gaping flaws in Iain Duncan Smith's poorly conceived, hopelessly inefficient and ludicrously expensive Work Programme in order to milk the taxpayer by collecting large "sign on" fees, then doing as little as possible to help the clients find work, the staff there have also invented an offensive code to describe the disabled clients that they are deliberately not helping to find work (despite the fact that the whole point of the Work Programme is supposed to be to help people find work). If a company can get a cash windfall of £400 for simply signing someone onto their scheme, the temptation must be to prioritise staff towards signing up more people, rather than attempting to find work for people that would struggle to find work in a healthy economy due to the severity of their disabilities, let alone in the economically stagnant mess George Osborne has created with his lunatic "cut now, think later" austerity experiment. It seems obvious to me that the payment of a large upfront attachment fee actually encourages practices like "parking".
According to the government's own figures £326 million has been paid out in "attachment fees". The allegation that "parking" exists as company policy amongst work programme providers gives a clear indication of how the Tory Work Programme has managed to achieve significantly worse results than had nothing been done at all, at a cost to the taxpayer of over £500 million pounds. On the 28th of January 2013 the BBC broadcast a shocking episode of the investigative documentary show Panorama in which it was revealed that employees of a government Work Programme contractor called Triage engage in a practice called "parking" a company strategy of enrolling disabled people on their scheme (which comes with an initial £400 -£600 "attachment fee, paid by the taxpayer) but to then spend as little time as possible helping them to find work in order to maximise profits.
0 kommentar(er)
